Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Bin Laden has several Nuclear Suitcases
THE ISRAEL REPORT ^ | Reproduced from the Jerusalem Report: October 25th, 1999 | Editorial Staff

Posted on 10/19/2001 7:05:25 PM PDT by vannrox

table width="100%" cellspacing=0 cellpadding=0 border=0>

LOGO

THE ISRAEL REPORT

September/October
photo

See Our Special Section:
Special: Radical Islam

Bin Laden has several Nuclear Suitcases

Reproduced from the Jerusalem Report: October 25th, 1999

Master terrorist Ossame Bin Laden has acquired portable nuclear devices, a U.S.-based expert on non-conventional terror believes. The only real question now is whether BinLaden has "a few," as Russian intelligence seems to think, or "over 20," a figure cited by intelligence services of moderate Arab regimes. "There is no longer much doubt that Bin Laden has finally succeeded in his quest for nuclear ‘suitcase bombs," says Yossef Bodansky, head of the Congressional Task Force on Non-Conventional Terrorism in Washington. In a recent book, Bodansky reports that Bin Laden’s associates acquired the devices through Chechnya, paying the Chechens $30 million in cash and two tons of Afghan heroin, worth about $70 million in Afghanistan and about 10 times that on the street in Western cities.

Bodansky’s statements corroborate 1998 testimony by former Russian security chief Alexander Lebed to the U.S. House of Representatives. Lebed said that 43 nuclear suitcases from the former Soviet arsenal, developed for the KGB in the 1970s, have vanished since the collapse of the former Soviet Union a decade ago. Lebed said one person could detonate such a bomb by himself, and kill 100,000 people.

Among the others who recognize the threat is Ben Venzke, director of Tempest Publishing. The U.S. firm plans to release a detailed technical handbook on dealing with nuclear terror next year. The danger, says Venzke, is quite real ? and is not confined to stolen Russian weapons. "It is really quite simple," he says, "to acquire radioactive material and combine it with an explosive or so-called dirty device." Yael Haran

US Nuclear retaliation.... extract.

US Nuclear Doctrine, Nonstate Actors, and WMD Under US nuclear doctrine, the 20 August 1998 attacks on Afghanistan and Sudan could have been carried out with nuclear weapons. US doctrine allows strikes against terrorist groups armed with weapons of mass destruction (WMD). In Doctrine for Joint Theater Nuclear Operation, a Joint Chiefs of Staff publication, "likely targets" for US nuclear weapons include "nonstate actors (facilities and operation centers) that possess WMD". "Nonstate actors" refers to terrorist organizations like the one US officials claim is headed by Osama bin Laden. At the same time, statements from Pentagon officials are openly contradictory. In response to a media query on the above US doctrine, a Department of Defense spokesperson said the policy referred to situations "in which the U.S., or allies or our forces have been attacked with chemical or biological weapons." However, even that statement included a caveat, that the US "does not rule out in advance any capability available to us." As US nuclear doctrine has evolved since the end of the Cold War, it has increasingly focused on the perceived threat of weapons of mass destruction, including arsenals held by "nonstate actors". As the following documents demonstrate, however, this policy is ineffective, contradictory, and actually increases the risk of further nuclear proliferation. * Nuclear Weapons Against Terrorism, by Hans M. Kristensen, Research Associate, Nautilus Institute, 28 August 1998. Highlights the contradictions in US policy. * US Targets Nuclear Weapons at "Nonstate Actors", BASIC Press Release,

Rising racism: "A Plague" (Barak)

Following the rise of Joerg Haider's anti-foreigner Freedom Party in Austria's parliamentary election, many Israeli leaders, including Prime Minister Ehud Barak have warned of the "spread of the neo-Nazi and fascist plague". "The rise of the extreme right must set off alarm bells among all the people of the free world who still recall the horrors of the Second World War," Prime Minister Ehud Barak said in a statement issued by his office. Haider's party surged to second place in the weekend election with just over 27 percent of votes, up from 22 percent in 1995, as Austria lurched to the right. "The prime minister voiced serious concern over the results of the Austrian election," the Israeli statement said. "The prime minister called on all enlightened forces in the world to band together in a common effort to block the spread of the neo-Nazi and fascist plague." Haider, a 49-year-old populist, once praised Adolf Hitler's employment policies and termed Waffen SS veterans "decent men of character". His party's showing was front page news on Monday in Israel, home to an estimated 250,000 survivors of the Holocaust. (Reuters)

Ehud Barak on Israel's Regional Profile: Extracts from the Jerusalem Post: October 1st, 1999

"We face three threatening circles. The closest is the terrorism circle within us and on our borders. After that, there is the circle of increasing regional conventional weapons. Finally, there is the circle of increasing regional non-conventional weapons. Our influence on the largest circle is limited, and, to some extent, it exists without any relation to us. Take Iran for example: when Iran looks east, it sees nuclear powers all the way to Irkutzk. Pakistan is nuclear, China is nuclear, India is nuclear, North Korea is nuclear. This is the scene they see and we don't have a major part in it. At the same time, we don't have a strategic interest in pushing ourselves as the symbolic and apocalyptic pole in the fight between good and evil. And by the way, Iran also looks westward and sees Saddam Hussein trying to develop nuclear power. So therefore, we need to put the situation into perspective. We have to push in the right direction, but this should not blind us to the needs in our own backyard, over which we can have an influence. In my mind there is a clear conclusion here: from our position of strength and confidence, within this window of opportunity, within this tough neighborhood, we can diffuse the immediate mines of the conflict, which are also those things that affect us on a day-to-day basis. Also, in a more long-term context, this will help to diffuse the long-standing base of belligerency towards Israel."
Back to ISRAEL REPORT September/October 1999 {} Return to Home Page


TOPICS: Editorial; Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-31 next last
Good read.
1 posted on 10/19/2001 7:05:25 PM PDT by vannrox (MyEMail)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: JMJ333
Gasp
2 posted on 10/19/2001 7:10:27 PM PDT by gcruse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: vannrox
Bin Laden has several Nuclear Suitcases

That should make him easier to find when he puts them in car to go to the airport - they'll be glowing!! </humor attempt>

3 posted on 10/19/2001 7:15:24 PM PDT by Norb2569
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: vannrox
All of Islam ought be made to understand that any Islamic nuclear attack on the US will mean the immediate Nuclear obliteration and radioactive salting of both Mecca and Medina.
4 posted on 10/19/2001 7:18:55 PM PDT by atafak
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: atafak
*
5 posted on 10/19/2001 7:22:31 PM PDT by breakem
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Norb2569
I pray that none of them are here already.
6 posted on 10/19/2001 7:22:59 PM PDT by oldtimer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: vannrox
The Chechnya rebels had nuclear suitcases? But don't use them in their war against Russia? Brings to question why? They think they can win without?
7 posted on 10/19/2001 7:25:27 PM PDT by not-an-ostrich
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: not-an-ostrich
Maybe he is referring to the Chechen mafia which is very visible as well as active in Russia itself.
8 posted on 10/19/2001 7:28:36 PM PDT by l33t
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: vannrox
Maybe we should get our friends Palestininas to go get the suit case for us, HEE, HEE!!!�
9 posted on 10/19/2001 7:30:17 PM PDT by factmart
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: atafak
We need somebody in a leadership position to say this to scare the crap out of them - and make them CRY (rue the day) that they ever attacked the United States.

They have been fighting this war for 30 years and we have treated them as petty criminals - now that our eyes are open, they will submit or they will perish.

10 posted on 10/19/2001 7:31:38 PM PDT by PokeyJoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: vannrox
Bin Laden has nukes. Bin Laden has smallpox. Bin Laden has weapons grade anthrax. Bin laden has thousand of cells in the U.S. Bin Laden has more airplanes. Bin Laden has the Death Star. Bin Laden has warp drive.

You know what? Bin Laden has crap! He has twenty guys with box cutters. He's got a couple vials of non-weaponized anthrax. He's got thirty guys with truck driver licenses. He's got some explosives and gasoline. He's got a cave with a cell phone and an electic fan. And he's got a hell of a lot of trouble because the U.S.A is pissed and we're coming after him with the most awesome array of weapons the world has ever known.

And if I read any more of this scare mongering and defeatism I'm going to puke.

11 posted on 10/19/2001 7:42:22 PM PDT by BigBobber
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BigBobber
I'm going to puke.

That sounds defeatist. :-)

But I agree. If he had all these assets before he would have used them.

12 posted on 10/19/2001 7:46:51 PM PDT by jlogajan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: jlogajan
Can Osama bin Laden go Nuclear?

Set a small tactical one off in his burnoose and I'm sure he'll go Nuclear!

13 posted on 10/19/2001 8:54:21 PM PDT by higgmeister
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: vannrox
BS in 1999 and BS today.
14 posted on 10/19/2001 8:57:28 PM PDT by Dog Gone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: vannrox
Time to use 2 nukes: Samson 1 and Samson 2
NOW!!!!!!
15 posted on 10/19/2001 9:07:58 PM PDT by maestro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: vannrox
I understand that these suitcase nukes are very limited in their blast effect. I understand that they might bring down a large building, but nothing really major.

Can someone who is really knowledgeable elaborate on this?

16 posted on 10/19/2001 9:21:43 PM PDT by Don Myers
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BigBobber
"You know what? Bin Laden has crap! "

That is a real possibility. We will see.

17 posted on 10/19/2001 9:23:31 PM PDT by Don Myers
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: not-an-ostrich
The Chechnya rebels had nuclear suitcases? But don't use them in their war against Russia? Brings to question why?

Maybe because some of them just might want there to continue to BE a Chechnya, instead of a crater that glows in the dark?

18 posted on 10/19/2001 10:06:42 PM PDT by Stefan Stackhouse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: oldtimer
Reproduced from the Jerusalem Report: October 25th, 1999

Master terrorist Ossame Bin Laden has acquired portable nuclear devices, a U.S.-based expert on non-conventional terror believes. The only real question now is whether BinLaden has "a few," as Russian intelligence seems to think, or "over 20," a figure cited by intelligence services of moderate Arab regimes. "There is no longer much doubt that Bin Laden has finally succeeded in his quest for nuclear ‘suitcase bombs," says Yossef Bodansky, head of the Congressional Task Force on Non-Conventional Terrorism in Washington. In a recent book, Bodansky reports that Bin Laden’s associates acquired the devices through Chechnya, paying the Chechens $30 million in cash and two tons of Afghan heroin, worth about $70 million in Afghanistan and about 10 times that on the street in Western cities.

I pray that none of them are here already.

If he's had them at least since 1999, then he has had plenty of time to smuggle several into the US. What other reason do you think they have had for keeping Bush and Cheney more than a bomb's blast diameter away from each other?

19 posted on 10/19/2001 10:10:51 PM PDT by Stefan Stackhouse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: vannrox
WE CANNOT AFFORD TO NOT BELIEVE THIS!!! Yes it may be an exageration. Yes it may be wrong. SO WHAT?!?! If we proceed on any other basis than that they have these devices and are willing to use them. We don't deserve to survive.

AND IF THEY DO NOT HAVE THEM NOW THEY WILL HAVE THEM IN THE FUTURE

So why are we screwing around being 'nice guys'?

Why are we allowing further infiltration/immigration?

Why are we not deporting all non citizen M.E. visitors?

Why are we not calling any M.E. resident allien or citizen who has had any affiliation with any Islamist in for lie detector tests?

Why are we not deploying tactical nuclear weapons in the M.E. in response to their use of weapons of mass distruction here in our nation?

20 posted on 10/19/2001 10:23:15 PM PDT by mercy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-31 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson